I read a really good fic today, well the first 2 parts, at least, of
Tracing the Plot by
sparcck. At the end of her post was a link to her LJ… so I went. I was immediately captured by the funny, quirky, ranty, and insightful things she had to say. I felt like I had just discovered a panel in a newspaper or magazine that I was just going to have to read every day. I wonder if she gets converts like this all the time? Makes me feel kind of ashamed that my LJ's so fluffy and blabby (maybe I should call it
Duo's LJ instead of
koyasunomiko's LJ), or kind of envious that I had thought of it first (or something equally as petty).
Then again, I can't bring myself to write about really deep stuff - issues that are really important to me and bother me - in this kind of public medium. I mean, my best friend reads all this stuff! Can you just imagine the sniping that'd be going on if she read all that I
actually think about her?! ^_~
So I suppose it's not meant to be. Hmm… but don't worry, I guess I do have my moments. After all, remember that post about the whole WTC thing? Yeah. ::feels better:: I'm not a complete airhead, after all.
::thwaps Angelica over the head::
No comments outta you!What I'm Reading: Lord of the Rings, Book I by J.R.R. Tolkien.
I hate to be one of those people who gets into something because it's all popular at the moment. I really do. But I've always
wanted to read
LOTR. I just could never work up the enthusiasm - the description of the story on the back of the books leaves something to be desired, let me tell you! My mom told me, when I was younger, that she had read (or tried to read)
The Hobbit, but that she couldn't get through it. Well, I know my taste and my mom's taste are practically polar opposites, but you know how, when you get a bad recommendation, you seem to just lose enthusiasm for whatever it is they didn't recommend? Well, I guess that's how it was for me. I felt threatened by the length of the books and the series, and intimidated by the sheer volume of Guides "to Middle Earth," "to
The Hobbit," "to
Lord of the Rings," etc., etc. Which, when I think on it, doesn't make much sense considering I've read series that were much longer and more complex. But I guess that's not the point.
Well, anyway, so now here's the movie. Saw it twice. Not that I loved it so much I had to go out and see it again, but I saw it once with Angelica & Liz, then saw it again with my parents & Liz. At least it was good enough to see over, otherwise I'd have had to suffer through it. But it was good. (I'm not a big movie fan, in case you couldn't tell. I find it difficult to suspend my disbelief; I'm always looking for the glitches, bad editing, etc. which kind of leaves little appreciation for the movie itself. Although I do admit the exception to the rule is usually made with sci-fi/fantasy movies. But don't get me started on a romantic-comedy rant!)
So the movie seemed interesting enough that I figured,
Okay, I think I'll try the book. Liz borrowed
The Hobbit from her school library, but returned it instead of lending it to me like I asked. ::glares in Liz's direction:: Then she borrowed the first book of
LOTR from a friend in her class and finished it on Tuesday night. So Wednesday morning I stole it from her and started reading it before she could return it to her friend. Aren't I bad? Well, I did promise to have it done for Monday. Which means I'll have to get some serious reading done this weekend. I'm only on page 104 of 479. Well, I think that should take about 6 hours. Maybe I'll be able to finish it on Saturday… if I'm not interrupted too much.
At least I'll read books 2 and 3 before the next 2 parts of the movie come out. Then I'll be able to tell if I really liked the movies in comparison with the books - from both sides: reading the book before watching the movie
AND watching the movie before reading the book..
So far, I'm up to the part
*SPOILER ALERT* (not a big one, though) where Pippen, Sam & Frodo are hiding from that first Ringwraith behind the roots of that big tree. I've found that the book goes
a lot slower than the movie! Did you know that the time between Bilbo's departure to Rivendell and when Frodo leaves the Shire with the Ring is actually closer to 20
years than the not-even-one-week that the movie seemed to have implied? Everything goes much more quickly in the movie… of course, I understand why, and it was quite well done. After all, if you're going to the movies expecting it to follow the book to the T, you're going to be sorely disappointed.
Besides, Aragorn and Legolas's scrumptiousness
quite makes up for it. Don't you think?