my moral standing is lying down

The Chase (YouTube)

A 1946 movie from Nero Films and directed by Arthur Ripley. It's based on the novel The Black Path of Fear by Cornell Woolrich.

The movie is abt Chuck Scott (played by Robert Cummings), a down on his luck WW2 veteran who, thru an act of kindness, ends up as the chauffeur for a Miami gangster called Eddie Roman (played by Steve Cochran). Now with a steady job and a place to live, Chuck is doing okay! That is, until he forms a bond with Lorna (played by Michèle Morgan)--who just happens to be Eddie's wife…

Actingwise, things are solid. Cummings and Peter Lorre (as Eddie's right hand man Gino) are good. Cochran plays his gangster role with this suave vibe who will turn violent in an instant. I like how he plays Eddie in a way that will unsettle viewers; he also has a v. magnetic persona.

Do I have any criticisms?

The plot feels like two movies in one (and not in a good way). With the first half being verrrrrry noirish as the suspense keeps building up. Then something happens that has the story change lanes in a way that made me MUPPET FACE at the screen.

Lorna as a character was uninteresting. I'm not sure if it was the direction or Morgan's own acting limits or what. She had a couple of good scenes with Cochran and then I'd be like "whatever, girl."


Do I recommend it?

I do as long as you accept that the movie will take a sharp turn. It's also only an hour and 30. I"m giving it a 2.1 out of 5. I didn't feel like I wasted my time watching it, but it's not one I'll rewatch any time soon or, like, ever.

Queerness level:

An argument can be made for Gino's closeness and protectiveness toward Eddie. At least, the way Lorre plays him. YMMV.


Le trailer

Watch on YouTube

The Big Sleep (Hoopla)

This is for the 1978 version of the movie that's based on Dashiell Hammet's noir novel by the same name.

I'd say that the most popular adaptation of that story is the 1946 one--which is the first adaptation--with Humphrey Bogart as Phillip Marlowe and Lauren Baccall as Vivien Rutledge nee Sternwood. That's a movie I've watched a lot of times, and one I own in physical and digital formats. I love it backwards and forwards. As for the book…I read it almost 20 yrs ago and the most I can say is that it's v. much of its era. Obvs, certain things were softened for the 1946 movie due to the censorship code thingie that was in effect at that time.

But, when I found out that there's a 1978 version, my curiosity was piqued.

FTR, it follows the same premise as the book and the 1946 movie so, if you've read the novel or watched the Bogart film, this movie is mostly on track with those two.

The premise is abt Phillip Marlowe (played by Robert Mitchum), a private detective that gets hired by General Sternwood to assist him in a blackmailing case against the Sternwoods. At first, Marlowe thinks it's going to be easy. However, the more he gets involved, the deeper the rabbit hole goes.

I'd say that the best things abt this movie are James Stewart as General Sternwood and Robert Mitchum as Phillip Marlowe. They're both FANTASTIC actors who bring their A-game to a movie that's…not so great. Because Mitchum's got a laconic, slightly rebellious persona, I don't mind the fact that he's in early 60s at time of filming while, in the novel, the same character is in his early 30s. FTR, Bogart was in his late 40s in his version. So, yeah, Mitchum's a bit older BUT he's got the vibe and the presence.

Annnd that's pretty much it for the positive. This is a hella terrible movie, LOLsob. #SadTrombone


Do I have any criticisms?

For reasons I don't think anyone can explain, the setting was moved from California to London? Also, the only USians are Phillip Marlowe and the three remaining Sternwoods.

Secondly, the casting is just BAD outside of Stewart and Mitchum. No one else can act or, at least, embody the characters they're supposed to be portraying. Frex, there's Agnes, a secondary character that's still a little important to the overall plot. She's a secretary who is v. memorable in the 1946 version (played by Sonia Darrin in an uncredited role.) In the 1978 movie, she's played by Joan Collins. Even with her trampy vibes (per the character), she's not convincing enough.

As for the rest of the cast, well, their range goes from "super mediocre" to "oh, you poor soul. Who told you that you can act?"

The problem is that there are certain key scenes that are meant to be impactful, but the viewer can only laugh. Their acting is THAT crummy.

Also, since this is from the late 70s, there are several scenes of topless women (whether in photos or in a scene.) And, for reasons (I guess), every female character either decides to walk around without a bra OR they wear the equivalent of a handkerchief so their boobs are always bouncing around. Finally, the two main female characters (the Sternwood sisters) tend to mainly wear see-through tops just because. The violence is more in your face than expected. Many close ups of ppl with gunshot wounds, blood, etc. Finally, there are some 15-20 minutes toward the end of things that never happen in the novel. It goes somewhere but IHNI where that is.

One thing that surprised me was that this was the second out of two Phillip Marlowe movies starring Robert Mitchum.


Do I recommend this? No, LOL. It's a waste of time. LIke, Mitchum and Stewart try to do the best they can do, but it's not worth it. I'm giving it a 0.5 out of 5.


Queerness level

Don't even bother cuz there's none.


Le trailer

Watch on YouTube

OMG, I'VE COMPLETED THE FANNISH 50 FOR A THIRD TIME!!!!. NGL, I tried to make sure to have some stuff to talk abt BUT, at the same time, I wasn't fully sure it'd be enough to reach the finish line. 😅😅😅

In any case, I do plan to keep posting. At the v. least continue Noirvember and then a couple of posts for December. Woo-hoo to me, tho! 🥳

Suspense (YouTube)

A 1946 Monumental Pictures film that stars Barry Sulivan as Joe Morgan, Belita as Roberta Leonard, Albert Dekker as Robert Leornard, Eugene Palette as Harry Wheeler, and Bonita Grenville as Ronnie.

It begins with Joe, a drifter from the East Coast, who is now looking for work in Los Angeles. One guy tells him to talk to Mr. Leonard, the owner of an ice capade-type of show. Joe gets a job as a peanut seller. He's kinda 'meh' abt but, whatever. That is until Roberta (Mr. Leonard's wife) does her floor show. Suddenly, Joe is MESMERIZED, TAKEN, DROOLING, GAGA OVER THE HEAD with her. Afterwards, he begins to insinuate himself a little both with Roberta (i.e. pursing her romantically) and with Mr. Leonard (by showing him that he's got what it takes to be the general manager of the show).

After a promotion as Assistant Stage Manager, Joe redoubles his efforts to woo Roberta. Meanwhile, there's a woman named Ronnie who shows up back in Joe's life. It seems they have some history; Ronnie's DETERMINED to try to win him back, I guess?

Despite sounding like some melodrama, this is a 100% noir film. It deffo has the beats (questionable pasts for several characters, business that might or might not be on the level, Roberta AND Ronnie being femme fatales, Joe's obsession with Roberta, and the cinematography presenting the whole mess in fascinating shots.).

HOWEVER, the thing that makes this movie stand out from other noirs is that Belita (the actress portraying Roberta) was an ex-Olympic ice skater. So there are a lot of scenes where she's doing her thing on ice. And, like, at first, it sounds v. gimmicky. How the hell is noir gonna mix with someone skating on an ice rink? IDK what to tell you other that it all works really well, LOL.

The acting, lighting, and dialogue are all good!

I liked Barry Sullivan the most out of the cast. His portrayal of Joe as a guy who is dark in a way that is obnoxious but intriguing. Belita's Roberta is such a mystery. IHNI what her game was until near the end.


Do I have any criticisms?

Out of the 7 ice skating sequences, there were two scenes that I was v. meh abt. I kinda wish they'd been cut from the final edit.


Do I recommend it?

Yes! I know it's a weird premise, but the movie has a tight plot. I'm giving it a 4 out of 5. I think the only place it's currently available is YT right now.


Queerness level:

Non-existent, maybe? I'm kinda 🤔at Mr. Leonard cuz there are some vibes I picked up abt him and Joe that made me go "HMMMMMMMMMM".

And so, we arrive at November and the first of several posts abt film noirs I've watched.


Niagara (Hoopla)

From 1953, this film is a surprisingly intense movie.

Ray (Casey Adams) and Polly (Jean Peters) are a married couple who are enjoying their honeymoon some three years after their wedding. The plan is to spend a longish weekend at Niagara Falls AND for Ray to also do a bit of networking with the main boss of his company. ANYWAYS, once they get to the lodge place, they find out that there's another couple staying in the cabin they'd reserved.

Rose (Marilyn Monroe) manages to convince everyone to allow them stay a bit longer in the cabin because George (Joseph Cotten), her husband, is recovering from something after leaving the hospital. FWIW, there's a lot of tension between them. It's not clear how long they've been married, but George is not okay. Meanwhile, Rose treats him with a lot of contempt. The rest of the time, she likes to poke at his jealousy for funsies? Their dynamic is v. odd.

Ray and Polly do the tourist-y things, generally having a good time. During one of the excursions, Polly happens to find out that Rose is stepping out on George with someone else…

It had been at least 15 yrs since I first watched this movie. In all truth, I don't think I paid that much attention the first time around since I only had the vaguest of memories abt the plot this time around. The more I watched, the more I started to remember.

This is a FANTASTIC MOVIE FROM BEGINNING TO END. It's extreeeeeeeeeeeeemely noir: v. suspenseful, and gorgeously photographed. Marilyn Monroe was at the height of her power as a sex symbol. However, her role in this movie is the opposite of her happy-go-lucky, coquettish and ditzy persona. Rose is manipulative and will do whatever she needs to do to get ahead. So, if you're someone whose exposure to her filmography has only been the comedies (The Seven-Year Itch, How To Marry a Millionaire, etc), this is a movie that shows the depth of her acting talent.

OFC, Joseph Cotten NEVER made a bad movie. George is super complex yet easy to feel sympathy for.

The MVP is Jean Peters as Polly. She is a character who is kind and smart. At times, she shows lets some of her steeliness/backbone show and I applauded her for that. Especially at times when she's repeatedly dismissed by people (including her husband Ray who should've known better.) That said, it is because of her kindness that she's able to persevere. Peters was soo good that I want to check out other movies she's in.

As for the rest of the cast, everyone's fine?

Again, since the movie was filmed in Technicolor, the cinematography is AMAZING. Everything just pops off the screen. The movie itself is so engaging that, even when there are long scenes with little to no dialogue, viewers can't take your eyes off the screen. It's THAT good.


Do I have any criticisms?

There's a B plot abt Ray's boss (Mr. Kettering) who was obnoxious AF. Kudos to Don Wilson (the actor who portrayed him) for getting on my nerves, I guess. LOL. I think my annoyance was compounded by the fact that I really didn't care abt Ray. He was SUCH a loser.

I also don't know how I feel abt some parts of the ending (specifically the climax.)


Do I recommend it?

Hell fucking yeah! This movie has everything working so well that even the Mr. Kettering scenes weren't enough to deter me. I'm giving it a 4 out of 5.


Queerness level:

It's so low that one would have to jump thru many logic loops to come up with crumbs. :(


Le Trailer

IHNI WHY the trailer is in B&W given that the actual!film is a technicolor paradise, but there we are!

Watch on YouTube